It’s been a while since I’ve felt this overwhelmed both freelance work and agency work. There is so much going on I am trying to make lists as its the only way I can think to cover everything that needs to be fixed, updated, designed, prepared for print, billed, etc. I am thinking it’s likely I’ll be here at work until about 8:00 tonight. Which wouldn’t be so bad except around 5:00pm a ravenous hunger begins that is insatiable. Also our house is filled with girl scout cookies which was a very stupid move on my part as I’m eating about 8 a day.
Last night I went to a Casting Crowns and Leeland concert. I really enjoyed the whole night, it was amazing… I wasn’t a huge fan of CC but live they are incredible!! And Leeland are just so amazingly talented and worshipful for being so young. I saw a ton of people I know and it was great.
Amazing news flash. Our tax lady just called. WE ARE GETTING A REFUND!!! That is the FIRST time since we got MARRIED that this has happened. And when I have my own business??? I guess I should buy a laptop every year!!!
********************************************
I was checking my yahoo mail and this article came up about Oprah’s big give. I have to say, I sort of agree with it’s stance on this program… I LOVE Extreme Home Makeover, and there is an element to that show that is similar to Oprah’s Big Give, but it doesn’t elevate it to a game. The focus is always on the ones who are being helped and in need (which is why you cry your head off when watching it). What do you guys think? Check out the article below.
‘Oprah’s Big Give’ puts good works in a bad light
By Robert Bianco, USA TODAY
How can earning a spot in heaven compare with a place in prime time?
Anyone old-fashioned enough to believe in keeping acts of righteousness private should give a wide berth to Oprah’s Big Give (ABC, Sunday, 9 ET/PT), Queen for a Day as reinterpreted by the Queen of All Media. An Apprentice-type game that turns charity into a competitive sport, Give will strike you as immensely uplifting or horrifyingly vulgar, or an odd combo of both.
Good works clash with bad behavior, altruism shares space with publicity-masked-as-charity, all wrapped in the familiar reality-genre clichés. And at the stomach-churning center is that old American TV belief that every problem can be solved with a take-home prize, without any consideration for underlying difficulties.
Sunday we meet Give’s 10 big givers, who are broken into five teams and given a picture of a person in need. Their task: Figure out what the person needs and raise the money to provide it. At the end they face three celebrity judges (Jamie Oliver, Malaak Compton-Rock, Tony Gonzalez), even though they’d be better served by advice from people with hands-on experience in raising money without the benefit of celebrity.
Extreme Makeover: Home Edition treads much of this same maudlin, TV-knows-best territory. But at least that show doesn’t turn the people it’s making over into pawns in a game — a game that inevitably elevates the players’ problems to the level of the people they’re supposed to be helping.
It’s bad enough that what the people get has no necessary connection to what they need or deserve. What’s worse is it’s completely cut off from what they want, because the “prize” is decided by people who barely know them. For all its new-age trappings, Give is a throwback to a time when the poor were expected to be grateful for whatever they were given.
Seldom has the drive to do good works been as alarmingly, offensively presumptuous. When a homeless woman says she had hoped to be trained for a job, you can’t help thinking she may have had the best idea of what was best for her. Might there not be some widows who don’t want to be surprised with a block party or toy-buying spree, or who don’t like strangers telling their children how to best mourn their father?
There’s no doubt everyone involved means well, but then you do know where that road paved with good intentions leads, right? And it isn’t heaven.
Happy FREEZING Friday!!
